Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ New Zealand based Discussion Forums The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities... Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ... ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:56 pm Post Subject: hurro
hurro..!
hokey dokey.. then weve established dat u havnt leaft at all then old JG fulla.. u just went into stealth mode... :)
temper temper aye... my post certainly brought da wolf out of hiding like, as intended.. or was it?
Who am I? Luke or Darth? its hard to say.. maybey im just a speckle of dust on the camera lens.. or a splinter in the minds eye... aye..
snickle :)
oh by the way JG, like what was the conspiracy ting that you proved and it pisshed you off so much that u ...went into hiding?
im slightly curious and i havnt been very active here in recent months so excuse me for asking as i cant be bothered checking the threads to find out... cheers
You know.. accumulated fluoride taken internally can make people aggressive and easily annoyed, people should consider getting a good water filter if your still drinking tap water... because fluoride builds up in all parts of the body where calcium is present, teeth, bones, and the pineal gland, thats where a shed load of calcium is contained and if its replaced with fluoride over time it means that higher brain function and hormone production is depressed and it leads to irratibility and its harder to feel joy in life... fluoride also reacts with aluminium thats built up in the brain over time (from cookware, drink cans, deodorant sprays and roll-ons etc) to form aluminium fluoride which is 10x more toxic than fluoride alone and can cause alzheimers-like symptoms which also create irratibility..
something for people to be aware of...
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 857
Location: north-east victoria
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:09 pm Post Subject:
elevate , you've been hitting the rum again? anyway , the flouride intake , according to the latest theories , enables electronic indoctrination in any direction the evil emperor dictates , if aggression is wanted or passivity , it just gets dialed in
just like the chemtrail residue enables the establishment of paranoia , schizophrenia , or right-wing arrogance in a crop of wheat , at the press of a button
good to see you're back , elevate , darth , luke , whoever , when you come out of Bacardi- lightspeed overdrive , we'll talk
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 857
Location: north-east victoria
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:21 pm Post Subject:
hi , jay_gee , on the faint chance that you'll honour me by replying to this miserable under-funded post , i now realise it was hector who was sniveling on the chem issue , not you , sorry
actually , on the issue of google's impartiality , i think subsequent scientific , statistical analysis has shown , our progenitors , amateurs of sterling quality , with whatever faults , were closer to the mark than you were , and it would be admirable if you would admit that , and that your 100% now looks more like 33%
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 83
Location: wellington
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:43 pm Post Subject:
steve clougher wrote:
actually , on the issue of google's impartiality , i think subsequent scientific , statistical analysis has shown , our progenitors , amateurs of sterling quality , with whatever faults , were closer to the mark than you were , and it would be admirable if you would admit that , and that your 100% now looks more like 33%
If you can demonstrate to me how any of the arguments made by the post in question aren't answered and proven incorrect by my subsequent examples, I am quite happy to say I was wrong.
...but, to summarise the central tenet of the argument upon which of the rest of the stats of that post were based, I quote...
Quote:
"If you go to Google and simply type in www.yourwebsite.com you will find the REAL number of sites that have a link back to your website. This does not mean that the sites are being added to the Link Relevance, it only shows that they have the link on their website."
And, after all that, we're back to where we were. If you still believe that the original statement quoted above is correct after reading my explanation as to the basic errors that that person has made in forming their theory, then I am yet again banging my head against the proverbial brick wall.
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 857
Location: north-east victoria
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:53 am Post Subject:
that is the point , jay_gee
if you spend any time researching contentious issues , as we do , there is plenty of evidence that censorship is taking place
the propositions that you put forward seem very logical and plausible to a computer-bimbo like me , though i'm not qualified to judge, but if you look , you can find all the evidence you need for rapidly encroaching control measures in the once-free internet
steve
"........the Titanic sails at dawn,
everybody's shouting
which side are you on?........"
