| << View Previous Topic | View Next Topic >> |
| Author |
Message |
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:33 pm Post Subject: Has anyone seen a large Unmarked, gray plane in our skys? |
|
|
Hey all,
Not sure if this is the correct forum to post this.
This may be absolutely nothing, but it's been niggling at me since I saw it last Friday, so I have to know.
I don't knw much about planes so I'll try to describe it the best I can.
It was very long, with a very large wingspan. Was totally grey in color (not metalic grey, but a mat painted grey) It had absolutely NO markings at all.
Not sure exactly what time it was on Friday last week, but i was some time between 1:30pm to 5:30pm. It was flying from Welly airport.
As I said, may been nothing at all, but I would like to know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Hector
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 266
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:11 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Can you give us a better description of this plane?
For instance:
Where was it parked? on the terminal building side, or on the Rongatai side near George Bolt St?
How many engines? 2, 4 or 4 pairs? Did it have propellers? or was it a jet? high bypass, low bypass, or no bypass?
Were the engines sort of embedded in the wing or suspended on pylons below the wing?
Did the wings attach to the top or bottom of the fuselage? Did the wing tips have winglets?
Were the wings flat, and perpendicular to the fuselage, or were they swept up (or down?) and back? (or forward??)
Was the tailplane attached at the top of the tailfin, or more conventionally at the bottom, at the end of the fuselage?
Were there any external antennae or aerials that you could see?
Did the wings have external fuel pods attached to pylons under the wings?
What was the main undercarriage like? Two sets of wheels (of 2 or 4?, doubles?) or a whole row of 6 or 8 singles or doubles on each side of the lower fuselage?
Was the fuselage more or less the same diameter all along, or did the underside of the rear slope up as if there were cargo loading doors or a folded up ramp there?
Some distinguishing features would be helpful to identify the type.
... and welcome to the forum, Night_Owl. If you want mysteries solved, you've come to the right place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:51 am Post Subject: |
|
|
Great questions Hector, but I'm affraid I can't answer any of them accurately as I only have my memory to rely on...and at my age, it's not very reliable.
However I can say that it was a jet (I would have noticed/remembered props)
I only saw it flying (not at the airport) very low across the sky.
It looked very regal, very long indeed (longer maybe than a 747), and very slender.
My first thought's where that it was some kind of Diplomatic plane or such. But what struck me as odd the most was the lack of any visible markings.
I'm very sorry that I can't answer your questions with any satisfactory degree of accuracy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Hector
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 266
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:52 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
A-huh; a regal jet. That certainly narrows down the field, Night_Owl.
I think it was a Boeing 757-200. It was probably one of two operated by RNZAF. The one you saw was possibly the un-marked one they use for clandestine activity like the 3 times a week SATS (Scheduled AirForce Transport Service) run. You possibly saw the return run from Christchurch to Wellington then Ohakea and Whenuapai. It is a free service for transporting staff around the country.
See this link for a photo and technical data.
http://www.airforce.mil.nz/about-us/aircraft/boeing.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:17 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Wow!! the unmarked version of that plane could certainly be the one I saw.
How you managed to get it from my poor discription I gave is amazing. Well done indeed Mr hector <clap>
That happens to be the same model that supposidly hit the pentegon too huh...OMG!!...it's a monster, how could it not have be seen in the famous 5 frames huh?...or the ground eye witness reports??
When I saw it passing low in the sky, it looked so incredibly large!! (guess it may look smaller flying past you at approx 500mph or so, a cupple of meters of the ground though ah?) :lol:
btw: Thanks for your response and welcome hector. It seems this is indeed the place to get the answers :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
Hector
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 266
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:38 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
You're welcome, Night_Owl.
Regal -> royal -> the only 'royal' organisation flying planes in NZ is RNZAF. The only jets they fly are their two B757-200 frames. I'm not sure if one has no insignia and they don't use them for clandestine flights. The SATS information is true, though.
(somewhat off topic)
I can add this to my list of solved mysteries, but I am still waiting for a confirmation of my 'grey line' solution. It's been so long now I think we can accept that they are shadows and say "solved' to that one too. Comments anyone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
info4
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 165
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:57 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm not sure if one has no insignia |
I would confidently say that if these were RNZAF then they WILL have markings.
I think we will shoot out to the base in the next couple of days and see if we can get some photos of the 757's on the ground.
I do know from my experience of other non NZ military aircraft that low visibility markings are highly likely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:53 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Spoke to my brother in law today, who is a real airoplane nut.
I simply said: "Hey John, have you ever seen a grey unmarked 757-200?"
He replied imediately: "Yep, the airforce has two, that's what they use to fly helen around in sometimes..."
btw: It was definately unmarked (no RNZAF insignia, or any other.) I'm sure of that.
So I'm thinking surely an umarked plane would render itself more conspicuous simply by being unmarked. After all, it attracted my attention and I'm not even into planes.
So what's the point of no markings? unless maybe you had TWO umarked planes.......then no one would know which was which.....Just a thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ruapaka
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Posts: 339
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:10 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Hello all
I have been reading this thread (this diverse thread) and feel an urge to relay some info regarding a large grey unmarked plane and Hectors resolve that it be a military plane on specific transport missions (or to that effect). Hector, you have given a number of on--route destinations | Quote: | | return run from Christchurch to Wellington then Ohakea and Whenuapai | , is this list complete or could there be other destinations. I would imagine all airforce bases could be visited via the grey plane service. I have seen such a plane coming in to land at Woodbourne Base / airport just outside of Blenheim, Marlborough.
I have been observing the skies locally and reading what I can about chemtrails etc for about 4 years. I have photos, sky debris and some formal observations. (There is plenty of trail activity in my area.) I do not have any particular theory but rather a collection of theories as to what may be going on - I am not sure what to think sometimes.
As far as the 'shadow' lines/dark beams - I too have witnessed and photographed these. A question .... how come irregular shaped trails (curled, twisted etc) leave a straight 'shadow'? Is this possible Hector? |
|
| Back to top |
|
info4
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 165
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:06 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Hi ruapaka
And welcome
I went out to Whenuapai yesterday and took some photos of the 757 that the RNZAF has.
I would like to say that people who say "large grey unmarked plane" need to be a LOT surer about what they are looking at.
Details like size, number of engines, tail type etc are most needed (photos would be better).
I feel at times it gets a bit over the top and the implication is that the airforce has a bunch of unmarked grey planes flying around and up to no good. Well I guess they could have but we need more proof.
The aircraft (757) have low visibility markings as do most airforce aircraft. In this case as you will see it is a "large grey airplane".
Is this the one or not I don’t know but more detail in the identification process is necessary I believe.
| Quote: | is this list complete or could there be other destinations. I would imagine all airforce bases could be visited via the grey plane service. I have seen such a plane coming in to land at Woodbourne Base / airport just outside of Blenheim, Marlborough.
|
My initial reaction is no way but did some research on the net and found this article.
Also the cities you mentioned are the only airforce bases left (I was in the airforce for about 8 years). By the article below it can be presumed that the 757 is capable of landing at most airports within NZ as Woodbourne airport is on the small size when it comes to commercial jets.
http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/20060823-757diow.htm
| Quote: | August 23 2006
RNZAF C-130 Hercules aircraft are a common sight over the Blenheim CBD as they come in on approach to RNZAF Base Woodbourne but the sight of the Boeing 757, on final landing preparation yesterday, may have caught many by surprise.
The RNZAF had never attempted to land their 757 at Woodbourne before yesterday due to the runway length, weight restrictions and size of the airport taxiways. Cautious planning and an operational study had been conducted back in 2004 to significantly reduce the risks associated with the test flights.
The Commanding Officer of RNZAF 40 Squadron, Wing Commander Tony Davies, could not have been happier with the two test flights conducted and concluded that the aircraft exceeded the crew’s performance expectations.
“While the 757 may not be routinely used to fly into Woodbourne these successful tests flights certainly add another string to our bow in terms of airlift capability out of the Woodbourne base,” said Wing Commander Davies.
The RNZAF Boeing 757 replaced the Boeing 727 aircraft in May 2003. A major upgrade programme including the installation of a forward cargo door and surround and rear air stairs is scheduled to begin in March 2007. |
My thoughts are the aircraft you saw was indeed an RNZAF 757 (which they have 2 of)
But if it is not then we need to see more info on what it looks like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:32 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/media-releases/20060823-757diow.htm
That isn't the plane I saw. That one's very clearly marked.
Also, the one I saw was "Mat" Grey. NO markings what so ever....I'm VERY sure of that.
It certainly could be the same model though.
Like I said, I'm no "plane" buff so I couldn't comment on the structure of the plane any more than I have already. I'm very sorry.
I was just hoping that someone had seen it when I did. (Someone who knows planes) And could, shed some light for me.
Trust me, if you see it, you'll know. Because it will have NO(none, nada, zilch) markings, and it is "Mat" (flat mat, NOT metalic, NOT Shiney or reflective) grey.
Get the picture?
Couldn't be many Totally umarked, Flat mat grey planes about, surely? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Night_Owl
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 10
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:38 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Oh, I'm very sorry, my lovely misses has informed me that I have spelt "Mat" incorrectly. Apparently it has 2 "t's" (MATT).
Perhaps that why I'm being shown "metalic" planes.
Oh well, I've never been a good speller. Have always had 20/20 vision though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
info4
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 165
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:33 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Hello all
I have been reading this thread (this diverse thread) and feel an urge to relay some info regarding a large grey unmarked plane |
Probably not relevant anymore but found this picture of an ex Air NZ 767 that is unmarked.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1287300/L/
I found it while looking at this forum site.
http://nzff.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=4952
It may of had its repaint by now but not really sure on that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
info4
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 165
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:23 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Also here is something relevant as well
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4352302a13.html
Basically the articles says
| Quote: | Air New Zealand engineers are quietly working on top-secret aircraft at the Woodbourne air base as part of a new strategy for the airline to boost revenue.
Unmarked Boeing 737 aircraft are flown direct from their United States factory to the air base near Blenheim as little more than shells.
Two months later they emerge from the hangar at Air New Zealand's engineering subsidiary Safe Air, fitted out with luxurious private jet interiors for their super-wealthy owners. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
smashdracs
Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 999
Location: Wellington NZ
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:22 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Ruapaka said
| Quote: | | As far as the 'shadow' lines/dark beams - I too have witnessed and photographed these. A question .... how come irregular shaped trails (curled, twisted etc) leave a straight 'shadow'? Is this possible Hector? |
Good question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Hector
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 266
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:23 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
Oh? I missed that! (12 Feb last year! - the shame of it.) I sincerely apologise to ruapaka for not noticing the question and addressing it. Perhaps the last paragraph in the post https://www.mysteriousnewzealand.co.nz/forums/viewtopic.php?p=5889#5889 is a reference to this oversight. It all comes clear now. I was quite worried about that, but reluctant to ask for clarification in public.
If either smashdracs or ruapaka would re-post the question in the continually re-bumped "About those black beams..." topic, with the photo, I will answer it... or maybe it will answer itself.
Incidentally, the good folks at Chemtrail Central seem to think that the beams (black lines) are shadows. See Chemtrail Central FAQs; "What is the deal with the black lines?" near the bottom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
smashdracs
Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 999
Location: Wellington NZ
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:52 pm Post Subject: |
|
|
I will leave that for Ruapaka.
Cher! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |