Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ

[LoriUSA]

THIS WAS SENT IN ANOTHER CHEM TRAIL SITE:
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room


THE ARTICLE (BELOW) WAS WRITTEN IN 1975 - HE CERTAINLY KNEW WHAT WAS COMING!!

In Response To: "WORLD POWERS SHOULD OUTLAW WEATHER WEAPONS" 1975 EDITORIAL BY SENATOR CLAIBORNE PELL (Rayelan)


How many of the things that he mentioned in his editorial have already happened?

The tidal wave the day after Christmas in 2005?

Hurricane Katrina and Rita?

The snow storm in the midwest that is going on right now?

The HUGE floods in Europe over the last few years?

The many earthquakes in Iran and Turkey?

The hurricane in Central American that hovered in one place for days?

Global warming?

El Nino?

Ice bergs melting and breaking away?

HAARP?

Senator Pell is right. While the United States may control some aspects of weather modification, you know full well that Russia and China are right behind us!

Will the quest for the ultimate weapon turn our planet into something that is not habitable by humans, animals or plants?

When will the little boys with the big toys stop playing god?

:

"United States and Other World
: Powers Should Outlaw Tampering With Weather for Use as War
: Weapon",
:
: Editorial by Senator Claiborne Pell, D-Rhode Island, The
: Providence Journal Bulletin, 1975.
:
: By U.S. Senator Claiborne Pell

: The U.S. and other world powers should sign a treaty to outlaw
: the tampering with weather as an instrument of war.

: It may seem farfetched to think of using weather as a weapon -
: - but I'm convinced that the U.S. did in fact use
: rainmaking techniques as a weapon of war in Southeast Asia.

: I'm convinced we did because the Pentagon Papers contained a
: recommendation that an existing weather modification
: program be enlarged and the Defense Department; despite
: repeated opportunities, has yet to issue a comprehensive
: denial of such activities.

: And knowledgeable observers such as Dr. Gordon MacDonald, a
: leading scientific expert and former member of the
: President's Council on Environmental Quality, have also
: concluded that the U.S. Attempted weather modification
: techniques during the Vietnam war.

: We need a treaty now to prevent such actions -- before the
: military leaders of the world start directing storms,
: manipulating climates and including earthquakes against
: their enemies.

: Such a treaty is in our national interest because weather
: modification and rainmaking are just the opening wedges for
: a whole new area of potential environmental warfare
: techniques.

: The basic idea of environmental warfare is simple - - if a
: nation can learn to trigger natural events it can inflict
: terrible damage on an enemy through rainfall, flooding,
: tidal waves, earthquakes, and even climate changes that
: could devastate an enemy nation's agriculture.

: It may seem a great leap of imagination to move from an
: apparent effort by the United States to muddy the Ho Chi
: Minh trail in Laos by weather modification to such
: science-fiction ideas as unleashing earthquakes, melting
: the polar ice cap, changing the course of warm ocean
: current, or modifying the weather of an adversary's farm
: belt.

: But, in military technology, today's science fiction is
: tomorrow's strategic reality.

: Apart from the sheer horror of the prospect of unbridled
: environmental warfare, there is, I believe, another
: compelling reason to ban such action.

: We know, or should know, by now, that no nation can maintain
: for long a monopoly on new warfare technology. If we can
: develop weather warfare techniques so can and will other
: major powers.

: Experience has taught us that the weapons that make us feel
: secure today will make us feel very insecure indeed when
: our adversaries possess the same capabilities.

: Now is the time to act -- so we never have to worry about
: countries directing storms at each other.

[Hector]

Let's understand this clearly... you are suggesting that
1) all those earthquakes, storms, climate change and so on are the result of deliberate and intentional intervention by some human agency or other, and
2) that the good senator's editorial is evidence that he specifically predicted those particular events, and
3) weather modification on that scale, and remotely triggering earthquakes and the like, is a feasible proposition?

Frost fighters expend a lot of fuel and effort and are barely able to raise the near-ground air temperature a few degrees. What chance do you have of
creating a hurricane and then controlling its movement? ... Zip.