Click HERE to go back to the Mysterious New Zealand home page
Click HERE to go back to the Mysterious New Zealand home page          Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ
         New Zealand based Discussion Forums
         The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities...
         Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ...
         ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
 

The "Epidemic Prepardness bill"
[This is an ARCHIVE - To REGISTER or make a POST, click HERE to go to the Live Version of this forum]

 
    Go to:  Forum Home > General Forum (New Zealand)
<< View Previous Topic | View Next Topic >>  
Author Message
smashdracs



Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 999
Location: Wellington NZ

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:13 am    Post Subject: The "Epidemic Prepardness bill"  

Will everyone please get up in arms!?!

Does anyone know if this bad ass piece of work has passed???

Some points:

This law supercedes all other laws and rights…eg the right to freedom of medical choice.

Personal property can be commandeered, i.e. one’s home and car if considered needed.

The ability for police to use force on people SUSPECTED of having bird flu ( or ANY flu).

If they refuse they can be quarantined and … if they resisit ” enforced vaccination” they will be fined $ 4,000 and sent to jail for 6 months…
Law enforcement powers are expanded and this law can be enforced during a pandemic and during ” inter pandemic ” times..IE anytime the govt wants.
The language refers to ” medical officers”. Who are they? Does not say Doctors…

The language in the Action Plan even refers specifically to Tamiflu vaccinations which have not been tested and which was created to reduce symptomes of 2 flu viruses not including the Bird Flu.

Please take some time to review this and share the info with everyone you know.

http://uncensored.co.nz/archives/2006/06/13/martial-law-coming-to-new-zealand/#comment-3005
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:23 pm    Post Subject:  

The bill had its first reading in Parliament in May 2006 and has apparently now gone to the Select Committee for further consideration.

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/488120/712178

If you read some of the transcripts from Parliament you get the message that there are no procedures in place to handle an epidemic outbreak if it occurs at present. This is of course of huge concern to people already afraid of something like this happening; medical facilities inundated, breakdown of law and order, the impact on business and therefore economy etc. so it has to be addressed.

That’s fine and understandable however I’m not at ease with the following of the party line with the World Health Organization with what appears to be blind faith.

This said by Dr Jonathan Coleman of the National Party on 9 May 2006 at the first hearing:

Quote:
It is high time that we had this bill, because I can tell members that bird flu is not just a threat; it is imminent. It is almost upon us, and this bill is sorely needed. We cannot ignore the threat of bird flu any longer. The H5N1 strain of the virus is endemic in many countries in Asia, notably Viet Nam, and we know that with international air travel, it is just a matter of a short flight away. What is more, the strain has already caused numerous illnesses and deaths amongst humans in Asia, and the World Health Organization notes “that never before in the history of avian influenza have so many countries been simultaneously affected than in the past 5 or 6 years.”



http://www.hansard.parliament.govt.nz/hansard/Final/FINAL_2006_05_09.htm#_Toc136937947

The way things have been going, bird flu doesn’t seem to be anywhere near the threat that it was made out to be….

Some interesting information from Lorraine Day, M.D in the US just to give another perspective, or perhaps even reality, about bird flu:

Quote:
2. What are the symptoms of REGULAR flu (NOT avian flu)? These are also given on the CDC’s web site at www.cdc.gov/flu/keyfacts.htm. They are the following:

Fever of 100.4 degrees F or higher
Headache
Extreme tiredness
Dry cough
Sore throat
Runny or stuffy nose
Muscle aches

Stomach symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, also can occur but are more common in children than adults.

3. Question: How does anyone differentiate the symptoms of AVIAN FLU (bird flu) from the symptoms of REGULAR FLU?

Answer: As a physician, I can tell you that it is IMPOSSIBLE to tell the difference!

“How many people die each year from REGULAR FLU (NOT bird flu)?

“The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) states, “Every year in the United States, on average, 36,000 people die from flu.”

But this is a deliberate deception by the CDC!

“Below are the actual number of flu associated deaths from 1999 to 2002 from the CDC National Vital Statistic Reports:

753 deaths in 2002 (page 16 of report)
257 deaths in 2001 (page 16 of report)
1,765 deaths in 2000
1,665 deaths in 1999

“How does the CDC get from 753 flu deaths to its statement that 36,000 flu deaths occur annually?

“By combining flu deaths with pneumonia deaths. The CDC National Vital Statistic Report for 2002 lists Influenza and Pneumonia as the 7th leading cause of death in 2002. You probably already guessed it – only 753 of those deaths were flu-associated and the rest of the 36,000 were pneumonia-associated. If all flu-associated deaths are removed, pneumonia associated deaths still ranks number 7 by itself. The media used the false 36,000 deaths number in its coverage – 50 times the actual 2002/2003 number.
“Are the 257 to 1,765 reported annual flu deaths from 1999 to 2002 even accurate?


And this:
Quote:


My Talk With The CDC

Several months ago, I called the CDC and spoke with one of the doctors in the “Flu Division.” I identified myself by name and as a physician, and he gave me his name and position. I asked him how a physician like myself could possibly differentiate “Bird flu” from “regular flu.” He answered, “You really can’t.”
I asked him if we physicians were asked to go house to house to check for people with bird flu with the possibility of quarantine of the patient (for how long?) and the potential for the quarantine to cause the person to lose income or even to lose his job, how could we distinguish “Bird flu” from the “regular flu”? He agreed it would be virtually impossible.
Then I asked him why President George W. Bush was publicly contemplating QUARANTINE for these patients? His response was, “He didn’t get that from us here at the CDC. That’s ALL politics!”

See the whole article here:

http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/birdflu.htm
Back to top  
smashdracs



Joined: 23 Nov 2005
Posts: 999
Location: Wellington NZ

Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:57 pm    Post Subject: Black magicians rule the world  

http://www.parliament.govt.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/6/0/4/604034bbee0741ae9b9b957ab46c34a7.htm

Interesting to note the date that submissions closed on this....6/6/06 ie 666!
I wonder if that was a deliberate hint at our illuminati masters hand in this or a mere coincidence???
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:55 pm    Post Subject:  

Haha :lol: Who knows.....

And as far as the bird flu goes, it won't happen overnight, and it may not happen at all. :mrgreen:
Back to top  
satanzhand



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 173
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:17 am    Post Subject:  

I've sent my letters off stating my objection. I'm not to concerned about the whole issue though as we have such a small pissie army and police force which can't even control a small number of stupid criminals let alone the whole country ,hahaha.

Can anyone tell me what is so bad about 666, I mean really another name for the devil ( A metaphor) hardly worries me. As for the illumanti most people refer to, I have seen nothing illumanting about them ie. any behaviour above the level of zoo apes.
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:48 pm    Post Subject:  

Quote:
Can anyone tell me what is so bad about 666....


I don't think that it's bad, rather that it is interesting as it has been noted many times before how numbers appear to be significant with events i.e. 911 and 7/7 with the London bombings. If you do a little research you'll find out more.
Back to top  
satanzhand



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 173
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:00 pm    Post Subject:  

I'm aware of the links to such dates and there apparant links to nothing from guys like Alex Jones, David Icke and co. but they never give a real reason for there use. Anyway 911 was actually 912 to us NZ'ers and really should be 12/09/06 or at best 11/9 which means nothing untill you sprinkle a little media magic on it.

I'm very interested if anyone has a use for these numbers.

Syncronisty is apart of daily life when your looking for it, even when your not I find.

after all i found myself up in the middle of the night on 12/9 with my little son who never wakes up and just happened to turn the TV on straight to cnn (very unusual for me) and low and behold I see a plane fly into the second tower live!
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:42 am    Post Subject:  

Well there are many other web sites out there with a plethora of information about numbers and their meanings. Here’s some interesting numbers, synchronicity perhaps?

Quote:
Twin Towers, standing side by side, look like the number 11
The tragedy was on September 11, or 9/11. Adding this: 9+1+1=11
September 11 is day number 254 of the calendar year: 2+5+4=11
After September 11, there were 111 days more to the end of the year.
911 = emergency phone call
119 is the area code to Iraq
New York City has 11 letters.
New York was the 11 state to join the union
Ramsin Yuseb (The terrorist who threatened the Twin Towers in 1993) has 11 letters.
'George W. Bush' has 11 letters
Osama Bin Laden's name add up to 11.
The Pentagon consists of 11 letters
The first plane crushing against the Twin Towers was flight #11
Flight # 11 was carrying 92 passengers Adding this number gives us: 9+2=11
Flight # 77 who also hit the towers, was carrying 65 passengers Adding this: 6+5=11
The total number of victims inside the planes were 254: 2+5+4=11
The tragedy of 3/11/2004 in Madrid also adds up to: 3+1+1+2+4=11. It occurred 911 days after 911


And for some in depth scientific analysis, this web page is worth having a look at:
http://www.life-cycles-destiny.com/for/20th-century-war-terrorism-wtc-911-analysis.htm
Back to top  
satanzhand



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 173
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 4:14 pm    Post Subject:  

The website theory was a little to selective to be taken seriously for me. but thank you anyway I enjoyed reading it all regardless.

I find synchronicities every day, Robert Anton Wilson has a good experiment in his book Prometheus Rising in the first chapter if memory serves me correctly I recommend trying it. (Its all most like synchronicity is just part of life and you either notice it or not)

maybe its me but I still haven't read/seen or been told by anyone what is so scary/wrong/evil or anything about 666 or any of the other silly scary numbers floating around eg. 33

anyones thoughts are welcome on this topic
Back to top  
jay_gee



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 83
Location: wellington

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:29 pm    Post Subject:  

Carus wrote:
Well there are many other web sites out there with a plethora of information about numbers and their meanings. Here’s some interesting numbers, synchronicity perhaps?


selective pickings for examples, perhaps?

Carus wrote:
The date of the attack: 9/11 - 9 + 1 + 1 = 11

or, using the formula you use for Madrid: 9/11/2006: 9+1+1+2+0+6 = 19 = 1+9 = 10

Carus wrote:
119 is the area code to Iraq/Iran. 1 + 1 + 9 = 11

err, no it's not

Carus wrote:
Telephone country code for Afghanistan: 93 9 * 3 = 27; 93 - 27 = 56 = 5 + 6 = 11 = 1 + 1 = 2

why are you multiplying here when you were using addition previously? surely the transformations would follow a consistent pattern? ie. 9+3 = 12

Carus wrote:
Flight # 77 who also hit the towers, was carrying 65 passengers

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_77>no, it was carrying 64[/url]

and think of all those words closely associated with the event that don't fit the pattern...

World Trade Center (16)
American Airlines (16)
United Airlines (14)
Washington, D.C. (12)
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:47 pm    Post Subject:  

Hi jaygee

Firstly, the quote in my post you have referred to is not something I put together. This information can be found on the web on many sites.

Secondly, yes, 119 is not the country code for Iraq – it’s 964.

Thirdly, okay Flight 77 had 64 passengers on board, not 65.

Good spotting! I didn’t check the information properly. A good reminder not assume everything you read online is correct.

In any case, I think the topic has now got away from the initial message intended by smashdracs….
Back to top  
jay_gee



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 83
Location: wellington

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:06 am    Post Subject:  

Carus wrote:
Firstly, the quote in my post you have referred to is not something I put together. This information can be found on the web on many sites.


Indeed. As is the information that refutes it. :wink:
Back to top  
 
    Go to:  Forum Home > General Forum (New Zealand)
Page 1 of 1


Useful Search Engine Stuff: Google | Google New Zealand | Google Toolbar | Google Maps
Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group