Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ New Zealand based Discussion Forums The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities... Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ... ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 814
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:18 pm Post Subject: Scientists investigate Materials designed for Invisibility
It's often said that by the time news of a technological advancement reaches public attention, it's already obsolete.
Researchers are experimenting with new 'metamaterials' which may be able to "cloak an object and hide it from visible light, infrared light, microwaves and perhaps even sonar probes".
Read the New Zealand Herald article on this subject here.
Research into the chemtrail issue will often turn up anecdotal stories of 'missing planes' - contrails being formed behind what should be a plane, but on closer examination, nothing can be seen where the plane ought to be. We have witnessed this phenomenon ourselves in a series of photographs we took over the Waihopai Valley spy base. On a day of sustained chemtrail activity over the base, later examination of our photographs revealed a distinct absence of any kind of craft, plane or otherwise, at the formation point of the contrail.
I'm wondering whether the research into invisibility has gone a lot further in a possible military capacity than anyone has so far been aware of. Perhaps metamaterials have already been applied to certain types of aircraft...
I'm wondering whether the research into invisibility has gone a lot further in a possible military capacity t
I would say in my opinion for sure
Look at recent history with aircraft like the stealth fighters and bombers. They seemed to keep them secret for quite a long time and with one of the design requiremnts being low visibilty to radar it just seems to be a natural progression to "lets make the whole thing invisible "PERIOD"
We have witnessed this phenomenon ourselves in a series of photographs we took over the Waihopai Valley spy base.
A lot of the chems I see, in fact a good portion of them are started in the region near the Tangimoana installation. I have sometimes wondered if there was a connection. What do you think Mel?
Also, did you have a good look a anna1's photo of the 2 ' craft '. I blew them up and they were very interesting to say the least.
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 814
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 12:49 pm Post Subject:
Deano wrote:
A lot of the chems I see, in fact a good portion of them are started in the region near the Tangimoana installation. I have sometimes wondered if there was a connection. What do you think Mel?
We have seen and photographed heavy multiple persistent contrail activity in the Tangimoana region and base and, of course, there are our experiences in Marlborough and specifically over the Waihopai base.
We have always considered that the likelihood of a connection between the trails we saw and those particular bases is a strong one. In fact, if there is a militaristic or communications/surveillance type purpose in the way that genuine chemtrails might alter the atmosphere it could indeed suggest that there may be good reasons for them being applied over such installations.
It's interesting that they also happen to be near typical aircraft flightpaths. It's our view that contrails left by normal aircraft serve to obscure 'genuine chemtrail' activity by normalising the contrails in the minds of observers and by way of a 'muddying of the waters'. We don't necessarily believe that every persistent contrail seen in these regions or in others are 'sinister' or suspicious - it may be that a very tiny number are 'the real thing'.
There is no doubt the fact that persistent contrails left by normal aircraft are now so commonplace indicates something seems to have changed - fuels or the impact of new technologies on aircraft being the most credible. I don't buy the idea that it's simply a matter of the sheer number of flights now causing the problem, that doesn't fit with the facts.
Deano wrote:
Also, did you have a good look a anna1's photo of the 2 ' craft '. I blew them up and they were very interesting to say the least.
Yes, I hadn't looked at the larger version until you mentioned it in your post. I can't remember whose photos, but I have seen similar shaped craft before in images posted before. They don't really look like planes do they? But then, what would a plane look like photographed from that far away? Is it possible that the angle and distance has created some sort of distortion perhaps...?
