Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ New Zealand based Discussion Forums The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities... Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ... ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 266
Location: Christchurch
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 4:12 pm Post Subject: the depopulation agenda
seems to be picking up speed lately. guess the illuminati funded mad research scientists are getting anxious and giddy just thinking of all those nefarious culling methods.
caught this one on rense:
Quote:
I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola. The speech was given by Dr. Eric R. Pianka (Fig. 1), the University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert who the Academy named the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:10 pm Post Subject: follow the rabbit...
Hi,
I just stumbled on this site while researching 'chemtrails'. I'm not entirely convinced that we are being sprayed with chemicals from military or commercial aircraft. However I came across the concept of chemtrails while researching potential population reduction strategies that may be used on the general populace.
The global ecosytem is in a far more fragile, and dire, situation than people are being led to believe. Humanity is currently in overshoot by approximately 140%. The earth's carrying capacity will be exceeded by an estimated 400% by 2035 at current consumption rates. Twenty percent on the Earths population consumes more than 75% of its resources. If the other eighty percent increase their consumption rate (standard of living) to that comparable to NZ then we would currently have an effective population loading of more than 25 billion people! If the entire earths poplulation reduced their consumption rates to the level of people in Ghana we would still be in ecological overshoot by 2040 by 50%.
This was recognised back in the 1970's and plans have been forming since the early 80's on methods to avoid sudden ecological collapse and a massive, uncontrolled die-off event. I suggest you read this document:
http://www.clubofrome.org/docs/limits.rtf
Back then they didn't even realise that even more critical problems, such as ozone depletion, CO2 emissions and the decline in land fertility were accelerating the inevitable collapse. The time has come, they say, to make the ultimate sacrifice for the planet. It is now or never. A controlled cull or an uncontrolled catastrophic die-off.
We are being conditioned for this every day. Just read the Earth Charter:
http://www.earthcharter.org/files/charter/charter.pdf
Do some research on the Trilateral Commission, the Clinton Global Iniative, the Club of Rome, the Bilderberger Group etc. They are suprisingly open about what has to be done in the name of 'sustainability'. Cross-reference the names of the members of these groups, the same names will keep appearing - Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Gorbachev, Maurice Strong, Prince Charles, David Rockerfeller, Henry Kissinger, Jimmy Carter etc
Do some research on the Georgia Guidestones, they are at the heart of the Earth Charter, Agenda 21 etc.
It won't be long now. It can't be long now. Just read the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 266
Location: Christchurch
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:18 am Post Subject:
so, let me get this straight...you are saying that you believe in the illuminati's agenda to immanetize the eschaton? everything you posted was an illuminati tentacle organization (bilderbergers, trilateral commision, club of rome, etc.).
sorry, i don't buy into their nightmare, nor do i believe any malthusian doctrine of unsustainability. what we have on this planet is severely unbalanced resource allocation problems, many of which have been created or "helped along" by the illuminati new world order agenda and century of social movements and " -isms."
the illuminati have been murdering innocent people for centuries. there is nothing new under the sun. the vanity of vanities.
i hope i misread your post, and that you are simply alluding to their nefarious documents and crimes. if so, you won't find many here too surprised.
yet, certainly, you don't condone their viewpoint? and if you do, i'm sure you'd surely volunteer to salute isis and the pentagram and take a flying leap off the top of the christchurch cathedral. may god have mercy on your soul.
What I am saying is that recently I have become convinced that there is an organised and imminent plan to reduce the Earth's population. I believe that this plan has been developed over several decades, and soon 'the trigger' will be pulled. I would normally give little credence to conspiracy theories. However, while completing two postgraduate degrees (Ecology and Environmental Policy) I have had the opportunity to study, in some depth, Agenda 21 and its associated action plans. My thesis was on Implementation Strategies for Agenda 21.
It never quite seemed to make sense. Something was missing. Until I spoke to some of the leading proponents of the Earth Charter at a conference in Sydney. They said the same thing as the person you quoted, in graphic detail. After much research, and some very intersting conversations, I am quite stunned. The world has actually been divided up into 'human zones' and 'wildland zones'. Population limits for each land mass have already been determined .. for the year 2015. Nine million for Aust/NZ. Humans will need permits to enter wildland zones. If this is for real then how will this be done? That is the answer I am seeking.
War, disease, natural disasters won't work. They want to maintain control and avoid a 'Mad Max' scenario. I have heard them say it. Even if bird flu wiped out half the world's population it would only slow population growth for a few decades. We would just repeat the 1945-1970 boom. They want something that will make people think 'we brought this on ourselves by our own behaviour .. we nearly destroyed our home .. we must change'. Only then would humanity accept the guidelines. I have heard them say this. They wan to use an environmental disaster, blamed on overpopulation/consumption and human activty. Then the survivors will accept the limits that will be imposed on their growth.
I believe that serious damage is being done to the biosphere but I don't agree that any group has the right to play God. Hard decisions have to be made but they must be based on a global consensus, if that is possible. I don't know. I am just searching for the truth. Maybe I am going mad.
farewell
Who set the population limits for each land mass? Who exactly is the author :?:
The populations limits have been largely based on the work of emeritus Professor Albert Bartlett, and the subsequent outputs from the Gaia System Simulator, and the Earth Simulator (among the fastest super computers on earth (40 TFlops/s)).
This whole philosphy is based around the work of Sir James Lovelock, one of the greatest minds of last century. He proposed the Gaia Hypothesis which has been embraced by many leading scientists and politicians. Alexander King helped to found the Club of Rome in response to Lovelock and Bartlett's work. The CoR has prepared dozens of white papers for UNEP and wrote the draft versions of the Rio Declaration, Agenda 21 and the Earth Charter. Agenda 21 has been adopted and endorsed by 170 governments. Maurice Strong, senior advisor to Koffi Annan, is the guiding hand.
The term they use for our current dilemma is 'the World Problematique', or sometimes the 'Global Problematique'. If you do some simple research on these phrases you can quickly begin to discover the truth. The intention is to restore the mega-linkages that have been severed by human expansion and habitat fragmentation. The pilot project for this is The Wildlands Project. All simulations agree that North America can't support a human population of more than 50 million if the mega-linkages are to be restored.
When an ecologist looks at an ecosystem he doesn't just see plants and animals, he sees biochemical energy flowing between different trophic levels and facultative groups (photsynthesis, biomass production, nutrient cycling). When a sub-tropical forest is converted into pasture or cropland the energy flux in reduced by many orders of magnitude. Fully one-third of the the Earth's terrestrial surface is used for agriculture.
The World Problematique suggests that Gaia won't be able to support human civilisation in the near future because of the loss and disruption of this energy flux. We are currently 'mining' most of our renewable resources, as well as the non-renewable ones. Fish stocks, water resources, land fertility etc are rapidly declining. I have been asked 'if you had a terminal illness but there was a painful operation that might just save your life .. what would you do?' I have seen credible evidence that certain groups intend to perform this 'operation'. Hence my search for potential methods of implementation. They want minimum resource destruction, maximum control, absolute deniability.
environmental scientist Dr. James Lovelock's article in the Independent advocating nuclear power as a solution to climate change
An environmental scientist who promotes nuclear power :lol:
Nuclear power is dirty and peak oil is a sham. The Earth replenishes the oil that is taken. The powers that be have told the oil industry that their time is coming to an end and that they will create this paranoid scenario that it is running out in the worlds media so that the oil industry can make big bucks quick to soften the blow to the large drop in profits to come.
The Earth is not overpopulated and can sustain 8 Billion people easily. The problem is many energy alternatives are brought and buried, suppressed by the oil industry before they see the light of day. The Oil industry own many patents on these devices and choose to bury them because lets face it how can you make money out of something that creates ' free ' energy out of thin air, if released to the public someone would duplicate it and those poor oil boys would lose that profit margin.
6 more years 'theyve' got left to wreck the world, can they do it?. Time is short, better hurry. No doubt theyll be gobbling down as much fear based frequencies as they can in that time, the last hoorah. The last feed of human misery. We will prevail, and peace and love will rule triumphant!
