Click HERE to go back to the Mysterious New Zealand home page
Click HERE to go back to the Mysterious New Zealand home page          Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ
         New Zealand based Discussion Forums
         The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities...
         Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ...
         ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
 

Project Serpo - is this true?
[This is an ARCHIVE - To REGISTER or make a POST, click HERE to go to the Live Version of this forum]

 
    Go to:  Forum Home > General Discussion - UFOs
<< View Previous Topic | View Next Topic >>  
Author Message
John Anderson



Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 387
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:04 pm    Post Subject: Project Serpo - is this true?  

Hi All,

Quote:
“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity….. anything you can imagine we already know how to do.” - Ben Rich, former Head of the Lockheed Skunk Works, in a lecture shortly before he died.


Here is a story that at first glance on is tempted to dismiss as just another piece of fabricated misinformation designed to keep the internet UFO masses busy chasing fairy stories and dead ends. After reading all the information however, though not convinced, I feel it's worthy of becoming a topic of interest and discussion on this forum. I would like to hear some opinions from interested forum members on the material...

Project Serpo: The Zeta Reticuli Exchange Program

The story relates to a top secret exchange program of twelve US military personnel to Serpo, a planet of Zeta Reticuli, between the years 1965-78. This project allegedly evolved from contacts with a race of entities from Serpo that were associated with the incidents at or near Roswell, New Mexico in July 1947.The web site, www.serpo.org, is has apparently been created to publish gradual release of information derived from confidential documents pertaining to Project Serpo and to serve as a forum to discuss and question the veracity of the material. New releases trickle through every few days.

Quote:
The information began to be released on 2 November 2005 by a retired senior official within the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) who calls himself “Anonymous”. Until he chooses to make his name known, this is the way he will be represented here. Anonymous reports that he is not acting individually and is part of a group of six DIA personnel working together as an alliance: three current and three former employees. He is their chief spokesman.


Quote:
In 1965, we had an exchange program with the aliens. We carefully selected 12 military personnel; ten men and two women. They were trained, vetted and carefully removed from the military system. The 12 were skilled in various specialities.

Near the northern part of the Nevada Test Site, the aliens landed and the 12 Americans left. One entity was left on Earth. The original plan was for our 12 people to stay 10 years and then return to Earth.

But something went wrong. The 12 remained until 1978, when they were returned to the same location in Nevada. Seven men and one woman returned. Two died on the alien's home planet. Four others decided to remain, according to the returnees. Of the eight that returned, all have died. The last survivor died in 2002.


An interesting suggestion within the material is that Spielburg’s 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' was the result of some inside information, the movie having some close correlation’s with the Project Serpo story (or vice versa).

Quote:
It is reported that after President Ronald Reagan watched a special screening of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," he privately spoke to Steven Spielberg and said, "You don't know how true this really is." (The actual quote by President Reagan )


Here's the link to the Project Serpo web site:

http://www.serpo.org/index.html

Good reading everyone. :D :grey:
Back to top  
Deano



Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 741

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 pm    Post Subject:  

Interesting you posted this. I read through the many pages of the Serpo project only last night and find it completely fascinating. I had read very briefly of the subject some time ago but had not been able to find material as indepth as that. How long do you think the website has been up??
Back to top  
John Anderson



Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 387
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:52 pm    Post Subject:  

Hi Deano,

Quote:
How long do you think the website has been up??


It looks like it was created on 18th November this year as far as we can see.

Quote:
I had read very briefly of the subject some time ago but had not been able to find material as indepth as that.


Yes, Linda Moulton Howe apparently had a set of interviews in the 1990's which discussed the Ebens and the exchange program. Here's some interesting comments about the Serpo File by Whitley Strieber:

Quote:
I recently had a startling experience when something called "Project Serpo" began to be referenced on the Internet. This material involves the claim that the US sent a group of ambassadors to another planet in the sixties, a story that supposedly inspired the movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

In 1988 or 1989, I was at a UFO convention when an elderly man came up to me and said, "I was an ambassador to another planet." I tried to get away, naturally, but he said that he could prove it. He then leaned toward me and seemed to touch my forehead with his lips. As he did this, I heard a voice in my head say, "Serpico." I took this to be the name of a policeman who had been a famous whistle blower in New York. I said, "What does Serpico have to do with it?"

The man laughed and walked away. Frankly, I assumed that he was some sort of ventriloquist and a nut. I forgot about him. So you can imagine my surprise when, a few days ago, a friend brought my attention to a website about alleged ambassadors to another planet, and the information that this program was called "Project Serpo." Was the old man one of these ambassadors, and was the word he said, "Serpo," not "Serpico?" Linda Howe and I both have some information about this, and we will lead off this week's Dreamland by telling what we know. (You will see some references to Linda's material on the Serpo website.)


There is quite a bit of stuff on the web about Zeta Reticuli, a sample for those interested:

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc879.htm
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 7:09 pm    Post Subject:  

A very interesting and fascinating read...the series of postings on Project Serpo at serpo.org.

At the end of the last post no.11 there is a question regarding Whitley Strieber:

Quote:
QUESTION: UFO author Whitley Strieber claims to have been contacted by a man claiming that he was part of a human-alien exchange program in the '60s. Was Whitley "played" or did he actually meet one of the Team Members?
ANONYMOUS: The guy who approached Whitley Strieber in 1989-90, was a Team Member. We know him and knew the contact he made with Strieber, not once, not twice, but three times.


I wondered if the man who contacted Strieber was the man he talked about in his book The Key. The man said he didn't pay taxes but he also said that he was human - as far as I recall. However I think the encounter that later prompted him to write the book, The Key, took place somewhere around 1998. The book was released in 2001.
Back to top  
Carus



Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 352
Location: Auckland

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:03 pm    Post Subject:  

Looks like the Serpo web site has been recently suspended.

Found some info on a forum here:

http://www.alienhub.com/website/forum5/222.html
Back to top  
Hieronymous Bosch



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 266
Location: Christchurch

Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:21 pm    Post Subject: Re: Project Serpo - is this true?  

John Anderson wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a story that at first glance on is tempted to dismiss as just another piece of fabricated misinformation designed to keep the internet UFO masses busy chasing fairy stories and dead ends. After reading all the information however, though not convinced, I feel it's worthy of becoming a topic of interest and discussion on this forum. I would like to hear some opinions from interested forum members on the material...:


hi john,
i think you may have hit the head on the nail here...fabricated misinformation designed to keep the internet UFO masses busy chasing fairy stories and dead ends.

after a read of the forum threads posted on that site (there's a backup site still up listed in the forum link that carus posted (thanks carus for that)

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. notwithstanding some serious data conflicts as reported, as well as breaches in common scientific laws, the us dia "insider" referred to as "anonymous" makes credibility a real issue here. yet, we can't reject it entirely. i agree with this forum poster:

There are other candidates for “gross consistencies”, but I’ll keep my powder dry for the moment. I’m noting them carefully. The problem, of course, with these is that they might also be reasons to dismiss everything. It’s like strawberry ice cream. I lean to thinking that (like the anomalous orbital data) that’s so absurd it has to be true, because no-one would dare invent it. The false information component of disinformation has to be credible for the purpose of the disinformation to be achieved.
Logically there are four possibilities:

1) Anon is a pathological prankster and the reported data is either all invented or clumsily culled from other sources and added to a wild novelistic story.

2) Anon is operating to an agenda and the information is deliberately distorted, but contains a core of extraordinary truth.

3) Anon is doing his best to report data from an indirect source (personal notes, his own short or long term memory, or another person), but accidental errors, omissions and additions have occurred.

4) Anon is reporting everything faithfully and accurately as best he can present it.

Only possibility (1) means everything should be rejected. The other three necessarily mean that the story deserves close attention.


just imho.

cheers-
Back to top  
 
    Go to:  Forum Home > General Discussion - UFOs
Page 1 of 1


Useful Search Engine Stuff: Google | Google New Zealand | Google Toolbar | Google Maps
Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group