Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ New Zealand based Discussion Forums The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities... Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ... ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 814
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 10:58 am Post Subject: It's Official! How to Identify Misinformation...
Lucky we have the US government to educate us on how to recognise the truth when we see it! :roll: Their explanations on this web site pretty much cover anything remotely incriminating.
And in response to their mention of the Pentagon missile theory - the following, straight from the horse's mouth. I find it difficult to believe that this now famous quote from Donald Rumsfeld is a mistaken slip of the tongue. There were supposedly no missiles involved in any of the situations that occurred on September the 11th. In my mind, no genuine reason to make such a gaff, unless what he said was true and reflected how he and his officials were accustomed to referring to the Pentagon incident... :-k
Quote:
“It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”
Donald Rumsfeld answering Parade Magazine reporter Lyric Wallwork Winik in Pentagon Press Conference. October 12, 2001
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 140
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:46 pm Post Subject:
Very, Very interesting Mel...
In the comment quoted, Rumsfeld clearly and carefully distinguishes between airline flights and "the missile to damage this building"...
Does this mean that the US Secretary of Defense subscribes to "the most groundless Conspiracy Theories"?
Or does it mean that, knowing his comment to be false, the US Secretary of Defense is intentionally spreading disinformation to the US public through a journalist?
Or... does it mean that he's telling the truth and the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile and that French author Thierry Meyssan's "most groundless conspiracy theory" is not so groundless after all?
