Mysteries, Chemtrails, Aerosols :: Mysterious NZ New Zealand based Discussion Forums The strange & mysterious, archaeological anomalies, modern oddities... Current affairs, health & medical issues, Aerosol Spraying in NZ... ...and general interest: ARCHIVES
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:38 am Post Subject: More on Codex
At present, most New Zealanders have access to alternative therapies, supplements of effective dosages and options other than to take pharmaceutical drugs.
As I learn more and more about the Codex Alimentarius, I see this is clearly something that those who are interested in natural health or alternatives to drugs should be informed about.
From what I understand, Codex will eventually restrict high or effective dosage vitamins and minerals to being prescribed by doctors.
It will encourage, endorce and require countries in the WTO to accept cloned meat and if such countries withiin the organisation don't accept it, they are fined - already the EU is being fined for not accepting American beef. The fines are huge and are set to get bigger.
Codex will remove the requirements for labelling of ingredients such as GMOs, hormones and other things deemed safe by them.
Remember the lifting of the GE Moratorium a few years ago? Some people thought it was great, that it would be beneficial to scientists looking at making crops last longer and making them more resiliant to pests, therefore not requiring pesticides and in turn making them somewhat healthier.
Other people thought it was a terrible idea. The food crops weren't broken, so why try to fix them? What could the repercussions of modifying our foods genetic structure, since we've been doing it for years via hybrids and creating new varieties (look at how many potato varieties there are now that are 'new' and look at brocoflower - that radio active looking stuff that stinks to high heaven when cooked - for a couple of examples).
The fact is, we don't fully know what the repercussions, if any, might be.
Modifying our food source to the degree they intend and are doing is still fairly new.
Before there were pharmaceutical companies, we had 'remedies' - vinegar (ugh) for a sore throat, honey to help it go down easier, cod liver oil to help with joints, molasses to boost iron, vitamin C and garlic for that extra boost in our immune system during winter and epsom salts for constipation to name a few.
Now we have Strepsils for a sore throat - sucking on boiled lollies can have the same effect; voltaren (dyclofenac) to take down swelling in joints (it can cause ulcers and other problems if taken for too long - which then require more medical intervention); Endorcement to eat more red meat - because everybody knows bowel cancer is the s&^t (requires more medical intervention); Buccaline Burner - because it's so much more expensive and since it comes in a pharma packet, it must work!; harsh pharmaceutical laxatives that work when you really don't want them to.
We also have Ritalin and Prozac. Prozac is known to boost suicidal tendencies and Ritalin is often abused by parents who encourage doctors to prescribe it for their hyper active child. Many anti-epileptic drugs are also used in mental hospitals to zombify patients rather than actually treating the cause. Many illnesses are related to diet and a lack or too much of a particular nutrient, amino acid and so forth. Remember, we are all made up of chemicals and it is a fine balance that keeps us in reasonable shape. So why do those elites want to mess with the food? To cull the population and make themselves richer at the same time. To HARMonise.
I had a doctor shake his head as I mentioned trying to obtain a natural alternative to a particular drug I require. He shook his head as if to say "terrible idea" - shunning the concept of treating a problem at its root cause with non-prescription dosages. It wasn't my regular doctor. I'm sure my regular doctor would have stated, "almost any alternative to what you take is a good attempt". I had no such luck in tracking down the more natural alternative (an amino acid) and therefore conceded defeat and succumbed to legal addiction and quarterly visits to the quack once again. Yet, the product I was looking exists in smaller quantities in what I take now (only, that's all it contains, nothing else and no doubt not addictive like this stuff)- so why did the doctor shake his head? Because they have a deal with the pharmaceutical companies. The companies have a deal with the government and the government has a deal with the clinics.
This is how they make their money.
Conventional medicine can help some, but it doesn't help others and many end up on a cocktail of drugs that kill them quicker than if they weren't on them at all. There is room in this world for both to be practised, but with the disillusionment felt by many about the drugs not working, many are opening up to the concept that diet and vitamins may be just as, if not better than the expensive prescription they're being given and they don't know what's in it.
Personally, I believe in a bit of both. Natural medicine seeks to help treat the cause, not the symptom. Conventional medicine (aside from surgeries) tend to treat the symtoms and not the cause. - You have a headache, go take a pill. You have a headache - have you strained your neck, are you stressed, did you sleep funny, are you having trouble sleeping? You get the idea.
Should we be not only be denied fire (a natural element) in the wake of a hoax of global warming but ALSO be denied the right to choose whether we try a more natural approach to our individual health. And shouldn't we know what is in our food, if it is indeed what we think we are eating? These are all fundamentals. Once the contamination is complete, all we have are left to revert to are the seeds stored in the Ark Program (Switzerland). Why require an 'ark program' to store the worlds seeds unless someone thinks our science and our trade schemes are going too far? That we will break the natural process of our earthly biology so much that the prototypes will be our only bailout?
I haven't seen THIS particular video yet, but this guy (Dr. Robert Verkerk) is a scientist (not just some natural therapist) http://www.anhcampaign.org/campaigns/codex - give me time I'll get a chance to watch it tomorrow.
What say you?
It's not so bad, it won't BE that bad? This is BS? This is true?